Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
MADHAVAN NAMBOOTHIRI. N.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to tribunal's order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on selection criteria. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. impugned order assessment. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. disputed questions of law. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. supervisory jurisdiction defined. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. no illegality found in tribunal's order. (Para 18) |
| 7. final conclusion of dismissal. (Para 19) |
JUDGMENT
[OP(KAT) Nos.471/2025, 479/2025] MURALEE KRISHNA S., J
Applicant in O.A.No.1673 of 2025 filed O.P.(KAT)No.471 of 2025 and the applicants in O.A.No.2018 of 2025 filed O.P.(KAT)No.479 of 2025, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the common order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram (the ‘Tribunal’ in short), in those original applications.
2. The petitioners in these original petitions are working as Principals in different Government Arts and Science Colleges under the Director of Collegiate Education. They have been provisionally appointed by the Government, by issuing an order dated 23.08.2023, pursuant to the interim order dated 03.08.2023 in O.A.No.828 of 2023 passed by the Tribunal. Acc
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
