Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
BABU .C. – Appellant
Versus
RAJANI NT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance claims initiated by the wife highlighting her financial needs. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. appellant's arguments against maintenance refuted by respondent's proof of mistreatment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's duty to ensure reasonable maintenance amount awarded based on financial evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
Devan Ramachandran , J.
We are considering these two matters together because the constitutive facts are common and the parties are common.
2. The afore appeal and revision petition have been filed by Sri.C.Babu, who is the husband of the respondent. The latter filed MC No.45/2023, claiming future maintenance from Sri.Babu, on the assertion that she had been thrown away from the matrimonial home and does not have the resources to maintain herself; and she also filed OP No.214/2023 seeking past maintenance on the afore grounds, for a period of three years prior to its filing.
3. The learned Family Court took the matters to trial and allowed both in part, thus directing the appellant/revision petitioner to pay Rs.5,000/- per month as past maintenance for a period of three years prior to the filing of OP No.214/2023; and a further sum o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
