IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
GIRIJA AGED 61 YEARS W/O LATE SADANANDAN, KUNNATHULLY PULIKKAL HOUSE, PUTHURKARA, P. O. AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT – Appellant
Versus
NITHIN SADANANDAN S/O.SADANANDAN, 11/642, KUNNATHULLY PULIKKAL HOUSE, PUTHURKARA, P. O., AYYANTHOLE, THRISSUR DISTRICT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accident details and claim background. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's finding on employment relationship. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. final ruling and decision of appeal. (Para 5) |
| 4. arguments for and against the employment claim. (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion regarding evidence insufficiency. (Para 8) |
J U D G M E N T
This appeal is filed by the applicants in E.C.C.No.45 of
2017 of the Court of Employees' Compensation Commissioner (Industrial Tribunal), Thrissur. Appellants 1 and 2 are respectively the wife and daughter of late Sadanandan. He met with an accident at about 5.45 p.m on 26.07.2014 while driving auto rickshaw bearing Registration No.KL 8/AZ 7673 through Shornur Road. The vehicle overturned and he sustained grievous injuries. He was treated as an inpatient in a hospital from 26.07.2014 to 05.08.2014. He became permanently incapacitated on account of the injury sustained in the accident. Claiming that he was employed by the 1st respondent, the E.C.C was filed for compensation. It is to be noted that the 1st respondent is none other than the son of late Sadanandan and the 1st appellant.
2. Though notice was issued, only the Insurance Company entered appearance and the 1st respondent, s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.