Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
ABDUL RAHIM – Appellant
Versus
MARIYATH BEEVI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appellant disputes the family court's dismissal of his plea regarding the validity of 'talaq'. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding evidence and legal standards for 'talaq' communication. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. court's findings on lack of evidence and procedural compliance undermine the appellant's case. (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. the jama-ath certificate cannot substitute the requirement for direct communication of 'talaq'. (Para 10) |
| 5. the appeal is dismissed due to insufficient evidence to support the appellant's claims. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The appellant challenges the judgment of the learned Family Court, Kollam, in OP(Others)No.901/2021, since it has dismissed his plea for declaration of validity of the ‘Talaq’ issued by him to the respondent.
2. The specific case of the appellant is that he had issued three 'Talaqs' to the respondent - namely Exts.A3, A3(a) and A3(b), dated 24.09.2020, 24.12.2020 and 24.03.2021 respectively; and that this has been communicated to the respondent properly. He asserts that he sent Exts.A3, A3(a) and A3(b) to the respondent by post, but concedes that this was not with acknowledgement due. He, however, maintain
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
