Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
LIMNAS A – Appellant
Versus
MUMTAS P.P – Respondent
RP NO. 1524 OF 2025 | Mat.Appeal NO.381 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition address omission of vital document. (Para 1) |
| 2. court allows opportunity for parties to comply with terms. (Para 2) |
| 3. previous judgment recalled and fresh judgment to be dictated. (Para 3) |
ORDER Devan Ramachandran, J.
This petition, seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 30.10.2025, has been filed not because there is any error apparent on it, but because the ‘Mubarath’ agreement for divorce has not been filed on account of an inadvertent omission.
2. The original of the ‘Mubarath’
agreement has now been placed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner, subsequent to the judgment; and we are, therefore, of the view that the parties require to be given an opportunity of being able to act as per its terms.
3. In the afore circumstances, we allow this petition and recall our judgment dated
30.10.2025 in Mat.Appeal No.381/2025, thus with the same restored to file; and proceed to dictate a fresh one, as requested by the learned counsel on both sides.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
