SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56293

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
LIMNAS A – Appellant
Versus
MUMTAS P.P – Respondent
RP NO. 1524 OF 2025 | Mat.Appeal NO.381 OF 2025



Important Points

The court allows the review petition due to the omission of a crucial document, indicating that all relevant agreements must be presented for the fair adjudication of divorce matters.

Headnote

This review petition seeks a reconsideration of the judgment dated 30.10.2025 due to the omission of the 'Mubarath' agreement for divorce, now submitted. The court finds that this necessitates an opportunity for the parties to act on its terms. Consequently, the petition is allowed, and the previous judgment is recalled and restored for a fresh judgment.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.P.NIYAS, C.H.ABDUL RASAC
For the Respondents: K.N.RAJANI, T.U.ANUKRISHNA

Table of Content
1. review petition address omission of vital document. (Para 1)
2. court allows opportunity for parties to comply with terms. (Para 2)
3. previous judgment recalled and fresh judgment to be dictated. (Para 3)

ORDER Devan Ramachandran, J.

This petition, seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 30.10.2025, has been filed not because there is any error apparent on it, but because the ‘Mubarath’ agreement for divorce has not been filed on account of an inadvertent omission.

2. The original of the ‘Mubarath’

agreement has now been placed on record by the learned counsel for the petitioner, subsequent to the judgment; and we are, therefore, of the view that the parties require to be given an opportunity of being able to act as per its terms.

3. In the afore circumstances, we allow this petition and recall our judgment dated

30.10.2025 in Mat.Appeal No.381/2025, thus with the same restored to file; and proceed to dictate a fresh one, as requested by the learned counsel on both sides.

Sd/-

DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE Sd/-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top