SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56418

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
MATHAI A.T – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38639 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.K.NASSEER, SHRI.MUHAMMED ASIF ALI, SHRI.SUDHEER K.K, SRI.T.I.SAFDARSHAH, SHRI.MUHAMMED BILAL.V.A, SMT.MEERA R. MENON
For the Respondents: SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY

The appropriate remedy under the SARFAESI Act for borrower complaints regarding seizures is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Headnote:The petitioner availed a business loan of Rs.15,00,000/- from the respondent bank, leading to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act due to repayment default. An interim stay was ordered but not complied with. The court dismissed the writ petition and advised the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal per the South Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip ruling.

Table of Content
1. loan availed from bank led to proceedings. (Para 1)
2. interim order conditions not met. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025)

The petitioner had availed a business loan of Rs.15,00,000/- from the respondent bank. When default occurred in repayment, the bank initiated proceedings under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002 and Ext.P3 notice was issued to the petitioner.

2. On 21.10.2025, this Court granted an interim order staying all further coercive steps against the petitioner for a period of six weeks on condition that the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- within one month. Today, when the case is taken for consideration, it is submitted that the said direction has not been complied with.

In such circumstances, the remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in South Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip [(2023) 17 SCC 311] .

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top