SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56422

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
JOSHIS DOMINIC – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38684 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ADV SRI.JOSEPH T.JOHN
For the Respondents: ADV SHRI.K.S.ARUN KUMAR

Non-compliance with interim order necessitates approach to Debts Recovery Tribunal per SARFAESI Act.

Headnote:The petition concerns a loan of Rs.7,00,000/- obtained from the respondent, where default led to proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. An interim order was issued by this Court for payment which was not complied with, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The petitioner was directed to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal as per the decision in South Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip [(2023) 17 SCC 311]. The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

Table of Content
1. loan default leads to sarfaesi proceedings. (Para 1)
2. interim order non-compliance leads to judicial direction. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025)

The petitioner and his father availed an agricultural loan of Rs.7,00,000/- from the respondent bank. When default occurred in repayment, the bank initiated proceedings under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002, and Ext.P1 notice was issued to the petitioner.

2. On 21.10.2025, this Court granted an interim order staying all further coercive steps against the petitioner for a period of six weeks on condition that the petitioner remits an amount of Rs.12,50,000/- (Rupees twelve lakhs fifty thousand only) within a period of one month. Today, when the case is taken for consideration, it is submitted that the said direction has not been complied with.

In such circumstances, the remedy available to the petitioner is to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in South Indian Bank Ltd v. Naveen Mathew Philip [(2023) 17 SCC 311] .

The writ petition is dismissed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top