IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
PRABHAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
HARIDASAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fixation of property boundaries. (Para 2 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. handling of advocate commissioner’s report. (Para 3 , 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. jurisdiction of the trial court in evidence appraisal. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. judgment on legal grounds upheld. (Para 12 , 14) |
JUDGMENT
These appeals arise out of the concurrent findings recorded by the Principal Munsiff Court-II, Kozhikode in O.S.No.312 of 2009 and affirmed by the Additional District Court-IV, Kozhikode in A.S.No.51 of 2014 and hence taken up and disposed of by this common judgment. R.S.A. No.629 of 2015 is filed by the defendants 1 to 4 and R.S.A.No.671 of 2015 is filed by the defendants 5 and 6 in O.S.No.312 of 2009.
2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeals are as follows:
The respondents 1 to 3 – plaintiffs preferred a suit for fixation of boundary. Plaint A and B schedule properties originally belonged to the father of the plaintiffs 1 and 2 and to the 3rd defendant by partition deed No.2971 of 1954 and sale deeds Nos.820, 821, 822 of 1961. While plaint A and B schedule properties were in possession of one Ayyappan and the third plaintiff, Plaint B schedule property was sold to the father of the defendants as per sale
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.