IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
MUHAMMED IQBAL – Appellant
Versus
SHABANA K.A. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the munsiff court's order on decree correction. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. observations on compromise decree and rights. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. final conclusions and opportunities for reopening the decree. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT This original petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the order passed by the Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor, on the application filed by the petitioner under 152 CPC, seeking correction of the decree in O.S No.412/2017.
2.Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that two suits were filed by the parties, which were compromised between them in O.S Nos.412/2017 and 413 /2017. O.S No.412/2017 was filed for partition between the petitioner and other family members, and the matter was settled by compromise. The partition of the properties was made among five people. When an application was filed for execution, a sketch was prepared in accordance with the decree, which showed that the 1st petitioner’s property was a self acquired that had been land locked, as per the commissioner’s report. Therefore, he has filed an application for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.