Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
C.VIJAYADAS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. contract and timeline obligations (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. administrative procedure and responses (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. claim for reconsideration on lack of decision (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. consideration of necessary extensions (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. final directive for reconsideration and payment settlement (Para 10 , 11) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is a registered A-class contractor and he was entrusted with the work of ‘Construction of Foot Path, Tile Fixing and construction of drain in various junction in Balaramapuram -Vizhinjam road’. Exhibit P1 is the letter by which the tender submitted by the petitioner was accepted. As per the terms and conditions of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, the work ought to have been completed within eight months from 22.03.2018.
2. However, the petitioner could not complete the work within the said period, and hence acting upon the application submitted by the petitioner, the period was extended upto 31.10.2019. Even during the extended period, the Kerala Water Authority was carrying out certain works in the said area with regard to the laying of pipes. Therefore, a further extension of time was sought. A decision
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
