IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.TH, J
SURABHI EARTH MOVERS – Appellant
Versus
THE GENERAL MANAGER SOUTHERN RAILWAY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[WP(C) Nos.37741/2023, 39049/2023]
Both these writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner, being aggrieved by termination of a contract and the consequential re-tender of the work. W.P(C) No.37741/2023 is filed challenging the order of termination and W.P(C) No.39049/2023 is filed challenging the notification issued by the respondents by which the work is re-tendered.
2. Earlier, in response to a tender floated by the 3rd respondent in W.P(C) No.37741 of 2023 (4th respondent in W.P(C) No. No.39049 of 2023), for carrying out the work of ‘Standardisation of Formation in Alappuzha P way Section’, the petitioner submitted tenders. Being the lowest bidder, the petitioner’s tender was accepted and Ext.P1 is the letter of acceptance dated 06.06.2023. As per the terms of contract, the petitioner had to complete the work within a period of 24 months. The petitioner furnished the performance guarantee required as per the terms and conditions. The work of the petitioner included standardisation of formation of the railway tracks passing through Thakazhi to Puthannar.
3. According to the petitioner, due to the peculiar nature of the terrain, and also the fact that the track was passin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.