Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
RAKHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. necessary procedural requirements for issuing peace bond orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court must adhere to established legal precedents in deciding bond matters. (Para 4 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal framework regarding the issuance of peace bonds. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final decision to quash the lower court's order. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the counter petitioner in M.C.No.161 of 2025 pending before the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chengannur.
2. The petitioner has been served with Annexure-I order under Section 130 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (‘ BNSS ’, in short), directing him to show cause why he should not be ordered to execute a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum to keep peace for a period of one year.
3. The petitioner asserts that he has not been served with a preliminary order under Section 126 or served with any summons as contemplated under the BNSS . He contends that Annexure-I order is unsustainable in law because the Sub Divisional Magistrate has not set forth the substance of the information in the said order, which is mandatory under read with Section 130 of the , and the law laid down by thi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
