Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ARUN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. settlement of disputes leads to criminal case quashed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. no objections voicing from the parties regarding settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's inherent jurisdiction invoked due to non-serious nature of offences. (Para 6) |
| 4. quashing serves justice and legal harmony. (Para 7) |
C.S.DIAS, J.
---------------------------------------
Crl.M.C. No. 8964 OF 2025 -----------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of November, 2025 ORDER The petitioners are the accused Nos.1 to 7 in C.C.No.444/2018 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Thiruvananthapuram, which has arisen from Crime No.92/2018, registered by the Sreekaryam Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 341 294(b), 323 and 324 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Surksha Sanhita , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the res
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
