SGS AGRO FARMS LTD, S.G.SEKAR, RAJAKUMAR GANASEKAR, ROBIN VIJAYKUMAR, G.SATISHDAS, G.SHANTHI, G.SANDEEP DAS, S.FAUSTINA vs STATE OF KERALA

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SGS AGRO FARMS LTD, S.G.SEKAR, RAJAKUMAR GANASEKAR, ROBIN VIJAYKUMAR, G.SATISHDAS, G.SHANTHI, G.SANDEEP DAS, S.FAUSTINA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.MUHAMMED HANEEFF, M.H.ASIF ALI, ARAVIND T RAMESH, ASHIK ALI M.H., ASWATHI K.C.
For the Respondents: ITTY PAULSON, M.P.PRASANTH

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and settlement circumstances. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discussions on the amicable resolution and state agreement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's reasoning on quashing proceedings based on settlement. (Para 6 , 7)

O R D E R

Dated this the 25^th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 8 in C.C.No.95/2022 on the file of the Special Court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur for the Trial of Cases under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978, which has arisen from Crime No.597/2022 registered by the Mannuthy Police Station, Thrissur, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Section 4 20 read with Section 3 4 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 , 4, 5, 6 and 8 of the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2^nd respondent, who has executed A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document