SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56570

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ADARSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIDHI BALACHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SR PP SMT SEETHA S

O R D E R Dated this the 25th day of November 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.706/2022 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Perambra (Trial Court) which has arisen from Crime No.651/2021 registered by the Atholy Police Station, Kozhikode.

2. By Annexure A1 order dated 06.10.2022, this Court had enlarged the petitioner on bail, but subject to the condition that he should surrender his passport before the jurisdictional court. In compliance with the said order, the petitioner surrendered his passport before the Trial Court. Subsequently, as the petitioner had to travel abroad, he filed CMP No.5292/2022, to return his passport. However, by Annexure A3 order, the Trial Court dismissed the application on the ground that this Court has not permitted the Trial Court to modify the conditions in Annexure A1 order. The petitioner has got several opportunities to go abroad for the purpose of employment. Due to the condition No. (v), the petitioner is unable to take up any employment abroad. Hence, the condition may be modified.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. On a consideration of the facts

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top