EASWARAN S., J.

------------------------------

R.S.A. No. 132 of 2025 -------------------------------

Dated this the 25^th day of November, 2025 JUDGMENT This appeal is preferred by the Angadippuram Grama Panchayat, aggrieved by the concurrent findings rendered by the courts below in a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction.

2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:

The plaintiff instituted the suit stating that defendants 1 to 5 in the guise of the widening of the road are intending to trespass upon to the plaint schedule property and demolished the compound wall. Later, the appellant Grama Panchayat was impleaded in the suit. The defendants 1 to 5 resisted the suit contending that the plaint schedule property was not identified. The defendants also resisted the suit by contending that the plaintiff has no right to obstruct the road which is being used by the people for their commutation. The allegation that the defendants 1 to 5 trespassed into the plaint schedule property was denied. I.A.No.1191/2012 was filed by the plaintiff to implead the appellant as the additional 6^th defendant. The additional 6^th defendant contended that the western boundary