Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SAHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of offences alleged in the bail application. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. court's evaluation of the prosecution's evidence. (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. petitioner's defense against involvement in crime. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. granting of anticipatory bail due to lack of credible evidence. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner is accused No. 1 in Crime No.1790 of
2025 of Sasthamcotta Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the other accused are punishable under Sections 3 29 (3), 118(1), 118(2), 74 and 3(5)
and Section 62 (2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure 2, order, reads thus:-
“..on 14.10.2025 at 5.15 a.m., two persons had come on a motorcycle wearing helmet and brutally assaulted the complainant and his wife with steel rods..” [sic].
4. The case of the petitioner is that there are no credible materials to show that involvement of the petitioner and the other accused in the crime.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the Senior learned Public Prosecutor.
6. The learned counsel for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
