SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56617

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
BABU @ KOODAM BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13773 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.186/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.NIKHIL SANKAR
For the Respondents: SRI.M.C.ASHI, SR.P.P.

The court grants bail considering the duration of judicial custody and ongoing investigation stage, establishing conditions for release.

Headnote:This bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner, accused in Crime No. 186/2025, was arrested for possessing 25 liters of liquor for sale. The court finds granting bail appropriate considering judicial custody duration and the investigation stage. The final outcome permits bail under specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. facts of possession and arrest in liquor case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding innocence and bail opposition. (Para 6 , 7)
3. court's view on the appropriateness of bail. (Para 8)

O R D E R

This is an application seeking regular bail filed under Section

483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023.

2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.186/2025 of Nedumangad Excise Range Office, Thiruvananthapuram. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 55 (i) and 67B of Kerala Abkari Act .

3. The prosecution case is that on 01.11.2025 at 08.00 am, the petitioner was found in possession of 25 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor for the purpose of sale.

4. The petitioner was arrested on 10.11.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the allegations levelled against him and he has been falsely implicated in the crime.

7. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioner.

8. Having regard to the stage of the investigation and the tenure of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case where bail can be granted to the petitioner on conditions.

In the result, the Bail Application is allowed as follows :-

(a) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.

(b) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 A.M. and 11 A.M. for a period of three months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.

(c) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(d) The petitioner shall not commit any similar offence while on bail.

(e) If any of the bail conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top