Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56619
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
MARIYAMMA NINAN – Appellant
Versus
VINOD KUMAR T.K. – Respondent
CRP NO. 29 OF 2025
Important Points
Permission to withdraw a civil revision petition is at the discretion of the court, confirming procedural authority.
Subject
Civil Law - Revision
Headnote
Statute Analysis: The court evaluates the procedural aspects of withdrawal of revision petitions under applicable provisions. Facts of the Case: The petitioners brought a revision petition against the order dated 29.11.2024; however, they sought to withdraw it during the hearing.
Findings of Court:
The court granted permission for withdrawal.
Issues: The primary issue framed was whether permission could be granted for withdrawal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that consent for withdrawal is within the discretion of the court.
Result: The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Findings of Court:
The court granted permission for withdrawal.
Issues: The primary issue framed was whether permission could be granted for withdrawal.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reaffirmed that consent for withdrawal is within the discretion of the court.
Result: The revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHANDAS, SRI.SABU PULLAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: A.V. GOPINATHA NAIR
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHANDAS, SRI.SABU PULLAN, DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.)
For the Respondents: A.V. GOPINATHA NAIR
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition.
2. Permission granted.
Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
