Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
K.K.SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
C.K.VIKRAMAN NAMPOOTHIRI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks timely resolution of the interlocutory application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay in the appellate court necessitates directions from this court. (Para 4) |
| 3. the court emphasizes the need for prompt action to prevent infructuous results. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT This original petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuing directions to the Sub Court, Thiruvalla, to hear and dispose of I.A No.2/2025 in A.S No.3/ 2025, in a time-bound manner.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 1st respondent obtained a decree in O.S Nos.299/1999 and 613/2010, against the defendant. The petitioner has filed appeal suit A.S No.3/2025 and for staying the operation and execution of the decree, he has filed an application I.A No.2/2025, along with the appeal on 01.08.2025. It is submitted that, despite several postings having elapsed, the appellate court has not taken up the interlocutory application for hearing or disposed of the same.
4.On the other hand, the decree holder is proceeding with the execution case, therefore it is necessary to issue directions.
5.A report has been sought from the Sub Court, Thi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
