IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ARSHAD T.P – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the freezing of the account of the petitioner maintained with the 1st respondent/Bank. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that the Bank has received requisitions from the 2nd and 3rd respondents for the amounts of Rs.1,580/- and Rs.190/- on 01.02.2025 and 10.02.2025, respectively, and the Bank has effected debit freeze of the account. Apart from that, the Bank is having suspicions over the transactions in the account. The account was opened on 10.01.2025, showing a turnover of Rs.19,00,000/- to the establishment of the petitioner. But from January to March, the account recorded around 335 transactions with a total turnover of approximately Rs.4.85 Crores for both credits and debits. The 1st Respondent/Bank conducted a review of the transactions and found that there were a number of debits, each in the range of Rs.1,200/- to Rs.2,000/-, that too to the personal account of the petitioner. Even though the 1st Respondent has filed a Counter Affidavit stating these facts, the petitioner has not filed any Reply Affidavit controverting the same.
2. When requisitions are received from law-enforcing agencies for freeze/lie
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.