Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V. G. ARUN, J
KRISHNADAS.M.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for management change by petitioner. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments on necessity of prior approval under k.e.r. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court emphasizes proper routing of applications. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by the 4th respondent’s refusal to accept his application for change of management of the K.E.M.A.L.P. School, Kazhani, the ownership of which was obtained by the petitioner from his father.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the application is only routed through the 4th respondent and it is for the Director to take a decision whether to grant or reject the request for approval.
3. Learned Government Pleader contends that as per Chapter III Rule 5A of Kerala Education Rules (K.E.R.), change of management involving change of ownership requires prior approval from the Director. Hence, only after the petitioner obtains prior approval for change of ownership, his application for approval as Manager can be considered.
4. Considering the limited relief sought, this Court is not delving into the contentions based on the provisions of the K.E.R. There is merit in the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that when an app
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
