Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
ASHITHA AGED 42 YEARS W/O SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeking police protection against obstruction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding vehicle movement and public road damage. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs parties to seek legal remedies. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 20th day of November, 2025 This writ petition is filed seeking Police protection on the allegation that the movement of vehicles transporting raw materials and finished products to and from the petitioners brick manufacturing unit is being obstructed by the party respondents.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ unit is functioning with all requisite license and permissions and in such circumstances, respondents 5 to 9 have no right to obstruct the movement of vehicles.
3. Learned Counsel for respondents 5 to 9 submitted that the movement of heavily loaded vehicles to and from the petitioners’ unit has caused extensive damage to the public road. It is submitted by the Counsel that, apart from resorting to legal remedies, respondents 5 to 9 have not caused any physical obstruction as alleged by the petitioners.
4. Learned Government Pleader submits that the validity of Ext.P5 notification has been upheld by this Court and refe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
