Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
ADV. B.JEEVAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case's factual background and allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner against the proceedings. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's views on procedural irregularities and investigation discrepancies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
O R D E R
The accused in S.C No.391/2020 on the files of the Sessions Court (Special Court constituted under the SC/ST (POA) Act), Alappuzha has filed this petition to quash the proceedings against him in the said case. The offences alleged against the accused are under Sections 294 (b), 341, 323, 427 and 506(i) I.P.C and Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (POA) Act (hereafter referred to as ‘the Act’).
2. The allegation against the petitioner as per the final report is that he, an Advocate by profession, and who does not belong to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe community, physically assaulted and verbally abused the second respondent who belonged to Scheduled Caste community on 30.11.2018 at about 2:30 p.m, while the second respondent was engaged in the act of taking the photographs of the roof portion of his house, with the help of CW3, for producing the above photographs before the Consumer Dispute Redressal For
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
