SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56798

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
ABHIJITH P. JAYAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41833 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.M. Firoz, Jameel Ahammed M.S.
For the Respondents: O.M. Shalina, Sreejith V.S

A criminal charge does not inherently disqualify a passport holder from obtaining a Police Clearance Certificate if judicial permission for travel exists.

Headnote:(1) The petitioner holds an Indian Passport and requested a Police Clearance Certificate, which was denied due to pending criminal charges. The Passports Act, 1967, regulations are analyzed, emphasizing the necessity of a clear police report for issuance. (2) The primary issue revolves around the eligibility for a Police Clearance Certificate amid pending cases. The court determined that the existence of a criminal charge does not preclude travel authorization when judicial permission is obtained, thus highlighting the distinction between criminal proceedings and travel rights. (3) The court orders the issuance of a Police Clearance Certificate indicating the pending case, subject to appropriate modifications in the standard format.

Table of Content
1. request for police clearance certificate due to criminal charges. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding the issuance of the certificate despite pending criminal cases. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's observations on the legal requirements for clearance certification. (Para 5)
4. court's reasoning supporting issuance of police clearance despite pending charges. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

(Dated this the 7th day of November, 2025)

The petitioner holds an Indian Passport bearing No.P6735079, and sought for a Police Clearance Certificate from the 2nd respondent. Issuance of Police Clearance Certificate is a miscellaneous service provided by the authorities under the Passports Act , 1967. The Police Clearance Certificate sought by the petitioner was declined by the 2nd respondent on the ground that a case is pending against him in a criminal court. The case of the petitioner is that he has been permitted in the said case to go abroad to pursue his employment as per Ext.P3 order of the Magistrate and therefore, he ought to have been issued the Police Clearance Certificate for employment purpose.

2. Heard Adv.K.M. Firoz, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt.O.M.Shalina, the learned DSGI, and Sri.Sreejith V.S, the learned Sr. Government Pleader.

3. The learned DSGI relying on Chapter 14 of the Passport Manual 2010, pointed out that a Police Clearance Certificate is insisted for going abroad to satisfy that there is no police case against the person concerned and that therefore, the same can be issued by the respondent only on receipt of a clear police report. According to the learned DSGI, since there is admittedly a criminal case pending against the petitioner, Police Clearance Certificate cannot be issued to the petitioner. Relying upon Appendix-32 of the Passport Manual, it was contended that Police Clearance Certificates are issued by the authorities under the Passports Act , 1967, in the specimen contained in Appendix-32 and the said Certificate cannot be issued in the said specimen, when there is a criminal case against the person concerned.

4. The specimen Police Clearance Certificate contained in Appendix-32 of the Passport Manual reads thus:

Appendix-32 (Ref. para 2.1 Chapter-14)

Specimen PCC format for Indian Passport holders (to be issued on official letter head)

“There is no adverse information against Mr./Mrs./Miss …............ , holder of Indian Passport No. …........... issued at …....... on …..... which would render him/her ineligible for the grant of travel facilities including visa for …...... (name of the country).

Rubber Stamp of office of issue. Signature of Passport Authority.

5. It is evident from the specimen referred to above that a person is entitled to Police Clearance Certificate, only if there is no adverse information which would render him/her ineligible for grant of travel facilities. There is no dispute to the fact that the pendency of a criminal case is not a reason which would render a person ineligible for grant of travel facilities in India. The requirement of law is that if there is a criminal case pending, one is entitled to travel only with the permission of the Court before which the case is pending. As far as the present case is concerned, the petitioner is permitted by the Criminal Court to go abroad to pursue his employment. Therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner is ineligible for travel facilities. At the same time, it cannot be said that there is no adverse information against the petitioner.

6. It is relevant to note that this Court in Jayan v.

Union of India [2018 (4) KLT 1077] observed that mere registration of a crime does not invoke either Section 6 or Section 10 of the Passports Act .

7. In view of the above, notwithstanding the crime registered against the petitioner as Crime No.22/2024, there is no bar in issuing a Passport to the petitioner. This is on account of two reasons (i) No “criminal proceedings” are pending in any court as contemplated under law, and (ii) even if it

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top