JUDGMENT

The petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P13, P15, and P17 orders of the Additional Chief Secretary to the State, who represents the State in this Writ Petition. By Ext.P13, the petitioner's application, as a landless person, for assignment of land has been dismissed, since his wife is having a property her own, and the petitioner is living along with his wife and children in that property. Ext.P13 was sought to be reviewed, which was dismissed, vide Ext.P15, finding no reason for review. Once again a review is sought for vide Ext.P16, which also stands dismissed vide Ext.P17. Accordingly, Exts.P13, P15 and P17 are under challenge.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents. Perused the records.

3. Reference to various Exhibits produced in this Writ Petition will disclose the facts as follows:

4. The petitioner would claim that he was occupying various places in Idukki District from 1969 onwards. Initially, he came to a place called ‘Kurithykudy’, Manculam, in Idukki District, sometime during 1969. There, the petitioner constructed a hut and occupied almost 4 acres of Government land, whe