Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
SURESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
USHA KUMARI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's challenge against trial court ruling regarding written statement amendment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's scrutiny of procedural compliance and amendment timelines. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. final dismissal of the petition based on non-compliance with procedural rules. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT This original petition has been filed by the petitioner / 2nd defendant in O.S No.3887/2003, for challenging the order passed by the Additional Munsiff Court-I, Thrissur, for having dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for amendment of the written statement under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC, dated
27.10.2025.
2.Heard the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the
1st respondent filed the suit against the petitioner and others seeking a declaration, a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction, and directions to the trust to act in accordance with its bye-laws. The suit O.S No.3887/2003 was filed in the year 2003. The petitioner duly appeared and filed a written statement on 29.06.2004 itself. Subsequently, the petitioner also filed another suit against the same trust and other defendants in O.S No.1237/2011,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
