Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
VENUS ENTERPRISES, AHMED SALMAN, JASHID M.P., SREERAG K., VISHNU N.M – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against rejection of worker registration applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against the legality of rejection grounds. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive to remand for reconsideration. (Para 5) |
| 4. final ruling on the writ petition. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT This writ petition has been filed challenging Ext.P17 order of the 3rd respondent rejecting the application filed by the petitioners for registration of workers under Rule 26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 (in short ‘the Rules’) and Ext.P19 order of the 2nd respondent rejecting an appeal filed against Ext.P17 order.
2. The application filed by the petitioners for registration of its workers under Rule 26A was rejected by the 3rd respondent inter alia for the following reasons:-
1) At the time of inspection, no workers were found engaged in loading and unloading work.
2) No proper records have been maintained by the petitioners relating to engagement of workers for loading and unloading work.
3) If registration is granted, there will be loss of work for the pool workers and
4) If registration is granted, there will be law and order situation.
The appeal filed before the 2nd respondent was rejected stat
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
