IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
JESSY.T – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2025 The petitioner is recognized as a Draftsman and issued with Competency Certificate under Rule 2A of the Kerala Factories Rules (‘the Rules’ for short), which entitles her to prepare building plans and other structural drawings for factories under Section s 6 and 112 of the Factories Act, 1948 (‘the Act’ for short). While working on the strength of the Competency Certificate issued, the petitioner had prepared and submitted a plan for registration of a factory named ‘SWV Metals Private Limited’, under Section 85 of the Act. The plan prepared by the petitioner was forwarded to the Director of Factories and Boilers/ 2nd respondent. After scrutiny of the application, the 2nd respondent issued Exhibit P3 notice requiring the petitioner to show cause why her Competency Certificate should not be cancelled for deliberately suppressing the existence of the Eramalloor St. Francis LP School building immediately in front of the proposed factory. Thereupon, the petitioner submitted Exhibit P4 explanation admitting the omission on her part in describing the existing school building in the plan. Bei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.