SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PRASANTH SUNDAR RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAJIT
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ORDER

The petitioner is the 10th accused in C.C.No.41/2016 on the file of the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur, which arises from Crime No.539/2012 registered by the Thrissur Town West Police Station against the accused persons alleging them to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 120 B, 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 4 , 5 and 6 of the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (banning) Act, 1978.

2. The gist of the prosecution case is that, the 4th accused is Managing Director of the accused 1 to 3 Companies, the accused 5 to 13 are the Directors of the above companies and accused 14 to 16 are its Promotional Shareholders. The 1st accused Company was incorporated on 12.07.2007. The 2nd accused company was incorporated on

01.01.2010 as ‘Nano Power Corporation Ltd’. But, its name was changed to ‘Nano Excel Corporation Ltd’ on 26.02.2010. The 3rd accused Company was incorporated on 01.11.2012 for promoting the businesses of the accused 1 and 2 Companies. The accused persons had influenced people through advertisement and deceived them to invest money by promising to pay high profits. However, the ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top