Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
PRASANTH SUNDAR RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the charges against the petitioner. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenge to dismissals by referencing prior court rulings. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court substantiates the foundation for reconsideration. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. determination of the petitioner's right to re-evaluate prior orders. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 10th accused in C.C.No.41/2016 on the file of the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Thrissur, which arises from Crime No.539/2012 registered by the Thrissur Town West Police Station against the accused persons alleging them to have committed the offences punishable under Sections 120 B, 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 4 , 5 and 6 of the Price Chits and Money Circulation Scheme (banning) Act, 1978.
2. The gist of the prosecution case is that, the 4th accused is Managing Director of the accused 1 to 3 Companies, the accused 5 to 13 are the Directors of the above companies and accused 14 to 16 are its Promotional Shareholders. The 1st accused Company was incorporated on 12.07.2007. The 2nd accused company was incorporated on
01.01.2010 as ‘Nano Power Corporation Ltd’. But, its name was changed to ‘Nano
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
