IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
GURUSANNIDI REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT PRADEEPAN.T – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD: CHOVA P.O., KANNUR – Respondent
WP(C) NO.37917 OF 2025
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is an assessee under the Income Tax Act and being aggrieved by Ext.P2 assessment order, an appeal has been submitted, which is now pending before the 3rd respondent. It is pointed out that the appeal is already heard on two occasions, i.e., on 30.05.2024 and 11.07.2025. However, now the petitioner is aggrieved by the recovery proceedings that are being pursued, pending consideration of the said appeal, as evidenced by Ext.P9.
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that, since hearing on the appeal is already commenced, it is only proper that the recovery proceedings be kept in abeyance till the appeal is disposed of. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of directing the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible and the respondents are further directed to keep the recovery proceedings based on Ext.P2 assessment order pending until the appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.