Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
LIBIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to bail cancellation based on new allegations. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments for and against bail cancellation. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. legal standards for bail cancellation discussed. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's decision to allow bail. (Para 5) |
ORDER
The petitioner is aggrieved by Annexure-A2 order of the Sessions Court, Thalassery cancelling his bail granted in Crime No.647 of 2024 registered at the Kuthuparamba Police Station, alleging commission of offences under Sections 140 (2), 310(2), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 351 and 324(5) of the B NS , 2023. Investigation of the crime was later transferred to the Crime ranch and renumbered as 1499/2024. The petitioner, who was arrayed as the 16th accused in the crime, was granted bail as per Annexure-A4 order dated 30.01.2025. While granting bail to the petitioner, the Sessions Court imposed various conditions, including the condition that he shall not involve in any crime during the bail period. The investigating officer later filed an application seeking cancellation of petitioner's bail, alleging that he had violated the bail condition by getting arraigned as the accused in Crime No.184 of 2025 of the Koipuram Police Station
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
