SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56968

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
MUHAMMED MUSHFAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 11608 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SRI.LIBIN STANLEY, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL, SMT.R.GAYATHRI, SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA, SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE
For the Respondents: Smt.Sreeja V.

The court determines that the detention of a petitioner for an NDPS offence is unnecessary due to the nature and quantity of the contraband, allowing bail with conditions.

Headnote:This bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner, the first accused in Crime No.933/2025, was found with 1.10 grams of MDMA. The court finds the petitioner’s continued detention unnecessary after considering the duration already served. The main issues include the assessment of the need for bail under the NDPS Act and the court’s reasoning centers on the quantity of contraband falling under intermediate classification; hence Section 37 restrictions are not applicable. The petition is granted with specified conditions for release.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case facts and charges against the accused. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments presented by both sides regarding bail. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court's evaluation of the necessity for detention and application of the ndps act. (Para 7)
4. conditions for bail granted by the court. (Para 8 , 9)

ORDER

This bail application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).

2. Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.933/2025 of Valancherry Police Station, Malappuram; registered for the offences punishable under Sections 22(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [for short, ‘NDPS Act’].

3. The prosecution case is that, on 16.08.2025, accused Nos.1 and 2 were found in possession of 1.10 grams of MDMA in a car bearing registration No.KL-55/AD-9956 and thereby committed the offences alleged. Petitioner was arrested on 16.08.2025 and he has been in custody since then.

4. Heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Public Prosecutor.

5. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the prosecution allegations are false and that since petitioner has been in custody from

16.08.2025, he ought to be released on bail.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submitted that petitioner ought not to be released on bail.

7. Since the nature of contraband seized is found to be MDMA and the quantity of 1.10 grams falls under the category of intermediate quantity, the rigour under Section 37 of the NDPS Act does not apply. As the petitioner has been in custody from 16.08.2025 and as there is no possibility of an immediate trial, I am of the view that his further detention is not necessary. Therefore, petitioner ought to be released on bail.

8. In the result, this bail application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

9. In case of violation of any of the above conditions or if any modification or deletion of the conditions are required, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider such applications, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top