Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, MR. SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
HAMESHDAS K H. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal and petition raise common questions (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. challenges regarding eligibility and list preparation for appointments (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. oral arguments and representation in court (Para 5) |
| 4. counsel for appellants argues against interpretation of interim orders (Para 6) |
| 5. counterarguments by municipal corporation's counsel (Para 7 , 8) |
| 6. court addresses interim orders and compliance (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. ongoing agreement on appointment process among parties (Para 11) |
| 8. clarification on appointment arrangements until exhaustion of current lists (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Syam Kumar V.M, J
1. W.A.No.435 of 2022 and W.P(C)No. 33533 of 2022 are tagged together as they raise common questions for consideration. They are finally heard and disposed of together vide this judgment.
2. The Writ Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 09.03.2021 in W.P.(C)No.9892 of 2020 of the learned Single Judge. Appellants were the petitioners in the said W.P.(C). The said W.P(C) was filed by the workers included in the Daily Labour Roll (DLR) maintained by the Thrissur Municipal Corporation seeking a direction to the respondent Corporation to grant them an opportunity to pa
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
