IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, SYAM KUMAR V.M., JJ
UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS, NORTH BLOCK NEWDELHI-110 001. – Appellant
Versus
P.P.JOSE EX-CONST NO.704770373, POOVATHINGAL HOUSE VELLANGALLUR P.O, IRINJALAKUDA, THRISSUR DIST. KERALA-680 662. – Respondent
Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari, J.
The present intra-Court Appeal under Section 5 of the Kerala High Court Act 1958 assails the judgment dated 11.08.2023 passed in W.P.(C) No.28475/2014 whereby the writ petition filed by the respondent herein was allowed directing the appellants herein to assess the pension of the respondent in terms of the provisions of Rule 49(2) of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules 1972 (for short, 'CCS Rules').
2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent had joined the Border Security Force on 19.11.1970 and was discharged on 19.05.1981 after having rendered ten years two months and twenty- three days of qualifying service, excluding 95 days of extraordinary leave as per the Discharge Certificate [Ext.P1]. From 15.12.1980 to 12.02.1981, the respondent could not rejoin duty due to domestic problems and had applied for discharge. But, this period was taken as absence, and the discharge was on account of dismissal from the service. The dismissal order [Ext.R1(c)] dated 19.05.1981 did not disclose whether he was denied the pension or otherwise. Being aggrieved, the respondent filed W.P.(C) No.28475/2014 with the prayer to quash Exts.P5, P6, P7 an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.