Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, JOBIN SEBASTIAN, JJ
SHADANANDHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused convicted for multiple ipc offences. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the murder and evidence collection. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. trial court proceedings and charges against accused. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. medical evidence confirms homicidal deaths. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 18) |
| 5. circumstantial evidence requirements for conviction. (Para 15 , 19) |
| 6. first accused's presence crucial to evidence. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 7. validity of disclosures during police custody. (Para 30 , 31 , 34) |
| 8. recoveries strengthen case against first accused. (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 9. prosecution must prove conspiracy beyond mere relationships. (Para 46 , 58) |
| 10. prosecution's evidence against first accused sufficient. (Para 64 , 66) |
| 11. final acquittals and confirmations of convictions. (Para 67 , 68) |
JUDGMENT
Jobin Sebastian, J.
Crl.Appeal No.1715/2025 and Crl.Appeal No.1215/2024 have been filed by the first and second accused respectively, in Sessions Case No. 18/2018 on the file of the Sessions Court, Palakkad, challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed against them, for various offences under the Indian Penal Code in the said case.
2. In the above-said case, both the accused were
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
