Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MOHAMMED SAHEED – Appellant
Versus
NAFEESA K.K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court affirms reasonable maintenance based on health and income evidence. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. court clarifies unsubstantiated claims lead to dismissal of revision petition. (Para 4) |
| 3. costs imposed for false submissions in court. (Para 5) |
ORDER
This revision petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Family Court, Malappuram in M.C.No.98/2023 dated
7.7.2025.
2. The petitioner is the husband of the respondent.
The marriage is not in dispute. The petitioner claimed maintenance at the rate of ₹20,000/- per month. The Family Court granted maintenance at the rate of ₹15,000/- per month.
The said order is under challenge in this revision petition.
3. The definite case of the respondent is that, she does not have any job or income to support herself. Even though the petitioner has contended that the respondent is employed, no evidence has been adduced to substantiate the same. Admittedly, the petitioner is working in Saudi Arabia. According to the respondent, he is getting ₹1,00,000/- per month. The petitioner did not produce any document to prove his income. The evidence of the respondent coupled with Exts.P1 to P7 series would show that the respondent is sufferi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
