IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M/S. INDUSIND BANK LTD – Appellant
Versus
JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24949 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for vehicle blacklisting cancellation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. loan and indemnity bond execution. (Para 3) |
| 3. government response and compliance standard. (Para 4 , 5) |
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition seeks a direction to the 1st respondent to cancel the blacklisting of the vehicle mentioned in Ext.P1 and also to consider the request for cancellation of the HP endorsement made in the registration certificate of the vehicle bearing registration No.KL-53K- 5741. The 2nd petitioner submits that the issue is covered in his favour by Ext.P9 judgment of this Court in WA No.1756 of 2023.
2. It is submitted that the 2nd petitioner had availed a loan from the 1st petitioner Bank for the purchase of a JCB bearing Registration No.KL-53K-5741. The said vehicle was covered with a hypothecation availment with M/S Shakthi Finance Ltd, Palakkad, the additional 4th respondent.
3. The 2nd petitioner approached the 1st petitioner for the purchase of the vehicle for providing an advance loan of Rs.7,10,000/-, which was granted by the 1st petitioner. The registered owner of the vehicle had executed an indemnity bond in favour of the 1st petitioner, along with the 2nd petitioner, undertaking the liability to pay a sum of Rs.7,10,000/-, towards the amount advanced by the 1st petitioner. Consequent to the payment of the amount due to the existing finance, namely, Shakthi Finance Ltd., Palakkad, on 15.03.2024, they have issued an NOC for effecting cancellation of HP and the required Form under Form No.35 for effecting termination of the HP endorsement was also addressed to the 1st respondent, as seen from Ext.P6. It is in that background that the writ petition is filed with the prayers stated above.
4. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the request of the petitioners was not considered on account of the objection from the additional 3rd respondent.
5. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P6 is pending consideration before the 1st respondent, there will be a direction to the said respondent to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, with notice to the petitioners and additional respondents 3 and 4. Appropriate orders shall be passed within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to say, Ext.P9 judgment shall also be adverted to while taking a decision, as directed above.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.