Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ABDUL RAOOF – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to recovery notices under revenue recovery act. (Para 1) |
| 2. prior application and payment details regarding ex-parte award. (Para 2) |
| 3. stay on revenue recovery until case disposal. (Para 3) |
| 4. permission for withdrawal of secured amount. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioners challenge Exts. P5 and P6 notices issued under the provisions of the Revenue Recovery Act to recover the amount awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirur, in OP(MV) No.753/2019. This writ petition was filed at a time when the applications preferred by the petitioners to set aside the ex-parte award were pending consideration.
2. Thereafter, the applications were considered and rejected, against which the petitioners had preferred OP(MAC) No. 160/2023, which was allowed by this Court on 05.11.2025, on condition that the petitioners remit an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is submitted by both sides that the petitioners had remitted Rs.2,00,000/- and the ex-parte award has been set aside.
3. As the amount directed in OP(MAC) 160/2023 has been paid and the petitioners are to be allowed to contest on merits, the reven
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
