Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. SATHISH NINAN, MR. P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
BAIJU S/O. SASIDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
DIVYA G., D/O. GIRIJA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. original petition regarding recovery of gold and property. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. court's observations about evidence and claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. comparative analysis of claims on gold ornaments. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. assessment of property transaction and misrepresentation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final ruling on validity of claims and declarations. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
Sathish Ninan, J.
Mat. Appeal No.582/2016 and Mat. Appeal No.912/2016 are by the respondents and the petitioners respectively, in OP 1464/2013. The original petition was filed inter alia for recovery of gold ornaments, declaration of title, recovery of money. The O.P was decreed in part. Challenging the part of the decree against the respective parties, they are in appeal.
2. Mat. Appeal No.757/2016 is by the respondent (husband) in OP 402/2014, challenging the decree for divorce granted at the instance of the wife. Mat. Appeal No.756/2016 is filed by the petitioner-husband challenging the dismissal of his original petition seeking restitution of conjugal rights.
3. It is conceded before us that Mat. Appeal No.756/2016, Mat. Appeal No.757/2016, and Mat. Appeal No.912/2016 are not pu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
