Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMARUBIN @ AMARU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case originated from crime report. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. amicable resolution stated by parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. inherent powers explained in relation to criminal proceedings. (Para 6) |
| 4. court emphasizes harmony and judicial efficiency. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused 1 to 4, 6 and 7 in S.C. No. 745/2024 on the file of the Additional Sessions Court, Ottapalam (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has originated from Crime No. 116/2024 registered by the Thrithala Police Station, Palakkad District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 308 read with Section
149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 3 to 5, who have executed Annexures 3 joint affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the l
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
