IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SARATH CHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioner is the fifth accused in C.C. No.
194/2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Hosdurg (‘Trial Court’, for short) which has originated from Crime No. 959/2020 registered by the Bekal Police Station, Kasargod District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section s 143 , 147, 148, 341, 323, 324 and 506 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure AIV affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The party respondent has no subsisting grievance and does not wis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.