Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SEETHA N.R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case details. (Para 1) |
| 2. invocation of inherent jurisdiction based on dispute resolution. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. acknowledgment of no objections from parties involved. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. legal precedents supporting quashing due to settlement. (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion drawn based on case merits and societal interests. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 3rd accused in Crime No.179 of
2025 registered by the Pattanakkadu Police Station, Alappuzha, alleging commission of the offences punishable under Section 120B , 409, 419, 465, 468, 471 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel for the 3rd respondent submits that the other accused in the crime have paid t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
