Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
C.K.GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of case due to amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsels confirm amicable resolution and no objection to quash. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court may quash proceedings on inherent powers if offences are minor. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R Dated this the 15th day of December, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.964/2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Kottarakkara (Trial Court), which has arisen from Crime No.1693/2024 registered by the Kottarakara Police Station, Kollam alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 329 (3), 296(b), 115(2)
and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the fourth respondent, who has executed Annexure 6 affidavit, affirming the settlement. 3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
