SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57149

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M.MANOJ, J
PRAVEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.SREELAKSHMI SABU
For the Respondents: SMT.SURYA BINOY

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 15th day of December, 2025 The writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P4 show cause notice issued by the 3rd respondent. The primary contention raised against Ext.P4 show cause notice is that the same has been issued without jurisdiction. According to the petitioner, the licensing authority is not empowered to issue a show cause notice in a case of this nature, since Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for suspension of a driving licence only in certain specified cases. Rule 21 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules also prescribes the specific circumstances under which the licensing authority or the additional licensing authority can invoke its jurisdiction to suspend or disqualify a person from holding or using a driving licence.

2. It is the contention of the petitioner that none of the provisions under Section 19 of the Motor Vehicles Act or Rule 21 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules were taken into consideration by the licensing authority while issuing the show cause notice, as the charges levelled against the petitioner do not fall within the purview of the said provisions. However, it is a matter of fact that the petitioner has not submitte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top