SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 57210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
RISHAD K.V. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 41422 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.UNNI. K.K. (EZHUMATTOOR), SMT.ARCHANA N.
For the Respondents: SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN, GP

Court directed issuance of survey map and certificates in line with prior judgments, emphasizing legal compliance without revisiting prior land status.

Headnote:In accordance with the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, the petitioners sought a survey map and related certificates, which were refused. The court held that previous judgments covered this issue and directed the respondents to issue the necessary documents. As stated, the petitioners will provide a copy of the judgment for compliance and will ensure no endorsement of the land's previous status. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. claim for land title related to quarrying permits. (Para 1)
2. court's directive for compliance with earlier judgments. (Para 2)
3. disposal of writ petition with specific instructions. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The petitioners 2 to 5 claim title to 3.703 hectares of dry land. In order to obtain a quarrying permit and environmental clearance, the petitioners sought for issuance of a survey map and related certificates, duly counter signed by the Tahsildar. However, the same has been refused stating that the land in question was once an exempted land in terms of the Kerala Land Reforms Act , 1963. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved is squarely covered by the judgments of this Court inMathews K Jacob and another v. District Environmental Impact Assessment Authority [2018(4) KLT 913] and Kinallur Rock sand v.

State of Kerala [2021(2) KLT 351] .

2. On the fact that the issue is covered by the judgments above referred, learned Government Pleader has no quarrel.

3. In the circumstances, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent/Tahsildar to issue survey map and related certificates, duly countersigned by him, in accordance with law, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent, for compliance. Needless to say, that the State authorities will have the liberty to proceed against the property, if the same has been put to use for a purpose other than that of plantation, in accordance with law. It is further clarified that while issuing certificates there shall not be any endorsement with respect to the earlier status of the land as an exempted plantation.

This Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top