Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. Natarajan, J
T.BEENA – Appellant
Versus
VYSALI PHARMACEUTICALS LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition for error in temporary injunction ruling. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction issues regarding nclt claims and civil court authority. (Para 4 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's authority over nclt matters and applicable jurisprudence. (Para 5 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. final dismissal of the review petition. (Para 13) |
Judgment
(Dated: 12th December, 2025)
This review petition is filed by the petitioner/1st respondent in O.P.(C) No.800 of 2025, for review of the Order dated 10.06.2025 passed by this court.
2. The counsel for the petitioner has contended that the respondent herein filed O.P.(C) No.800 of 2025, challenging the order passed by the Sub Court, Ernakulam, in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S. No.41 of 2025, for having granted an ad interim injunction against the respondents herein. The same was challenged by the respondent No.1 herein by filing O.P.(C) No.800 of 2025 along with respondent No.2, who is the liquidator of the respondent No.1, the company, and the same was allowed by this court and set aside the order of granting temporary injunction vide impugned order dated 10.06.2025. The petitioner is the respondent in O.P.(C) No.800 of 2025, and the plaintiff in the original su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
