Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Appellant
Versus
SHEEJAMOL M.C – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. non-reporting of vacancies affects appointment rights. (Para 3 , 4 , 10) |
| 2. court's analysis of prior judgments and their implications. (Para 5 , 6 , 13) |
| 3. arguments on compliance and financial conditions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. conditions under which expired ranked lists may be utilized. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. judgment set aside and appeals allowed. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN, J
These intra-court appeals are filed challenging the judgment dated 31.07.2015 in W.P.(C)No.5881 of 2014, allowing the writ petition filed by the first respondent herein.
2. W.A.No.1191/2016 is filed by the 2nd respondent and W.A.No.1740/2016 is filed by the 1st respondent in the afore writ petition.
3. The first respondent/writ petitioner applied for the post of Clerk-cum-Cashier in the Ernakulam District Co-operative Bank Ltd (hereinafter referred to as 'the Bank' for short) pursuant to a notification published by the Kerala Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the PSC' for short). The PSC, after conducting an examination, drew up a rank list for the category and published it on 12.01.2010, as per Ext.P1. The rank list came into force with effect from 31.12.2009 and the first
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
