Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
AFSANA – Appellant
Versus
JASEEL @ MOOSA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing claims in matrimonial disputes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims and counterclaims in maintenance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. evidence of ornaments' misappropriation. (Para 6 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. return of misappropriated property. (Para 16 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha.J Appellants are the petitioners in O.P.No.643/2016 of Family Court, Irinjalakuda. By the impugned judgment and decree, the learned Family Court declined the relief of return of gold and patrimony and also disallowed her claim for past maintenance. Past maintenance for the child alone was granted.
2. Parties shall be referred to by their rank in the Original Petition.
3. The marriage of the 1st petitioner with the 1st respondent was solemnised on 4.5.2014 as per Muslim religious rites. 2nd petitioner is the child born to them in the said wedlock. At the time of marriage, 1st petitioner was given 35 sovereigns of gold ornaments . Subsequent to the marriage as demanded by the respondents, an amount of Rs.3 lakhs was given by her parents. After the birth of the child, her parents had given 5 sovereigns of gold ornaments to the child. Respondents misappropriated the entire 40 sovereigns of gold ornaments and patrimony
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
