Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
JOHN JOHNSON – Appellant
Versus
HDFC BANK LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks direction regarding cibil score. (Para 1) |
| 2. response indicates satisfactory cibil score for loan eligibility. (Para 2) |
| 3. court closes writ petition based on respondent's submission. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to the 10th respondent to consider Ext.P12 Representation. The grievance of the petitioner is that the CIBIL score of the petitioner is fixed on the lower side by the tenth respondent.
2. The learned Standing Counsel for the 10th respondent, on instruction, submitted that as on 07.10.2025, the CIBIL Score of the petitioner is 836, which is more than sufficient for getting loans if he is otherwise eligible to get loans, and hence, the petitioner cannot have any grievance against the 10th respondent in this regard.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed, recording the above submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the 10th respondent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
